Ads upon ads upon ads

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1321 year ago

    A single row of ads would be ok, but having this many plus an ad showing up first, where the search results should be… Oof

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don’t need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol.

          I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao.

      • Fontasia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices.

        I’m not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain’t putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they’d much prefer to run and maintain their own.

      • sunglocto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        They shouldn’t rely on ads to make money back on a phone IMHO.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      I don’t think ads showing something related to what I’m looking for are bad in and if themselves. I want to find related content, the problem is that these are often not in any way related to what I’m looking for. It’s just a list of who paid to be listed there.