I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

  • Hannes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    703 months ago

    I’m very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don’t see why I would go back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      433 months ago

      Same. Using Kagi feels like surfing the old web. The first thing I did was block all Pinterest results. That alone made every search golden. 😂

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        223 months ago

        I hate Pinterest lol, best thing about Kagi is being able to block whole sites and it remembers your preferences. I may come back to Kagi but I didn’t feel like funding their AI features development. Now Im using Searx and 4get cause they’re free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        133 months ago

        You’re not the only one. They have a leaderboard and the top 7 results are various Pinterest domains.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        213 months ago

        It’s a very minor annoyance and well worth it in my opinion.

        I was searching for a book quote for over a year. I tried every search engine, tried changing the terms, checking back several times every few weeks or so, but couldn’t find anything even close. I tried kagi and it was literally the very first result on my very first search.

        I haven’t looked back and have never had an issue finding what I’m searching for since.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        You pay instead of seeing ads, so they need the account. Remembers you, though, so you just login once. Plus they have a solution for incognito/private windows too.

        I really like it, has some cool features.

      • Hannes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        You can create a search-link that includes your token so you can also use it in incognito or if you are logged out for some reason.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Signing up and logging in isn’t a problem imo. I wouldn’t even mind if I had to pay for searches, but I’m not going to make it a subscription service. Unless they add an option to do something like buy 1000 searches that never expire, its not something I’d considered. I do think they beat out competitors like google with their results pretty consistently though based on the trial.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          163 months ago

          I’m not gonna subscription my heated car seats but search is a service that costs an ongoing amount to provide. The subscription isn’t significant, it’s $5 a month for 300 searches (or $10 for unlimited).

          I know we’ve been conditioned to expect search for free, but if we want to get away from the “the user is the product” model then I think it’s a good thing to have a subscription to a service that has ongoing costs to provide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              Ah right, I get you. I wonder if they have considered this. Pretty sure their free/demo tier is 100 searches not confined to a time period so presumably the platform could handle that model.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My blocks

      Edit: hm. I seem to have replied to the wrong comment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      I don’t remember any specifics, but I think I heard there were some privacy concerns?

      Then again, there seem to be privacy concerns about pretty much anything so might not be that bad…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        The concerns are about the credit card you use to pay.

        The argument is that they can associate the card with your searches.

        As far as I know they don’t keep search data. I’m personally happy with them

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          83 months ago

          I think this might be it. There were also some statements by the CEO I think which didn’t exactly inspire confidencenin their company - but again, I don’t remember the details unfortunately

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          That’s what’s kept me from using it, although I very much like the idea of paying for a good service. I would love to see them figure out a way to avoid accounts.

      • @majestictechie
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Never heard any issues with Privacy, but I’ve heard issues about them using Brave search Results as part of their results.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          If i remember right, it wasn’t just using brave, but including a referral id in brave searches. It wasn’t intended, and they fixed it, so all good with me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          It was not even the emails. I tried to duckgo it and only found this controversy (which was new to me). What I saw was a specific qute, possibly on topic of privacy or something adjecent which just made me go “nope!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Is it really $108/year good though for a single person (based on the tier that makes sense for me)? Just curious what other search engines you’ve used or tried and what features set it apart to make it worth spending the money on.

      • Hannes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        It’s the first one I’ve paid for. And it is that much better than the free ones I used before imho.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        That really depends on your use case and how valuable web search is for your daily life.

        I’ve personally tried Google, Bing, DDG, Brave search, and ChatGPT. Kagi is consistently able to find what I’m searching for more quickly and accurately than anything else, which has been very valuable for me in my personal and professional life.

        It’s easily worth the cost in result quality and time saving for me personally, but that doesn’t mean the same will apply to you or anyone else.

        As far as stand out features, there aren’t really any that I can think of. It just gives me the results I’m looking for without any bullshit to wade through.