• PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Removing him from public relations means removing him from the WAN show, which is a significant revenue source for them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      The wan show is arguably one of the better content pieces they put out. You actually get a good solid few hours of opinions and stories (and the occasional justification for their latest controversy)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      How much revenue will be lost because of him running his mouth?

      Change up the show and don’t let him address criticism, simple as.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      As I said in another comment: Maybe remove a part of him from that and let WAN show be just a tech talk + community Q/A + anecdotes.
      Maybe every few weeks give the new CEO the questions that accumulated about business for the transparency Linus wants to show/talks about.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        community Q/A

        That’s where a significant amount of linus’ previous controversies have come from

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Fair point. I meant it more in regards of anecdotes and past experiences and less in the way it evolved to.
          I think my communication and lack of english skill is hindering me in what I mean.

          Basically less of that and more of the other stuff that will cause less controversy.