On a technical level, how is TikTok being blocked/banned in the US?

Can I still sideload the app to my phone? Is it only being banned from the two big app stores? Is there a penalty for being found in possession of the software on US soil?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    794 days ago

    I believe I read that the ban prohibited new downloads but wouldn’t stop existing users from continuing to use, however the parent company kinda put a middle finger up and said they would stop service in the US completely, probably by IP/geofencing? Take with grain of salt.

    • elgordino
      link
      fedilink
      554 days ago

      Yeah. ByteDance, the owners, are choosing to block US users to kick up the maximum fuss possible. From my understanding they didn’t need to, they just risked withering away because there would be no new users.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        To be honest, I’m surprised they care as much as they seem to- the US is such a small percentage of their potential user base. If my app lost 5% of my potential new users I’d be curious why, but I probably wouldn’t put any effort into getting them back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          They know that Trump will make a fuss about it next week and release the ban, blaming the Dems, so that people forget the China tariffs he has been talking all campaign.

          Trump is so predictable that these totalitarian governments play him like a fiddle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        Yeah, they won’t geofence. Still money to be made from existing US users. And no one puts principles above profits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    293 days ago

    No app store download and no hosting in the u.s. Even if they weren’t blocking u s. Users the amount of video traffic suddenly hitting their servers outside the country would cripple their infrastructure and seriously hinder other Internet traffic. Since net neutrality doesn’t exist anymore, ISPs can be paid to block it or seriously cripple it.

    Still totally legal to install the app and access the content. However the same content will be reposted to other platforms which will be a great passive revenue stream for someone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 days ago

    Why do they care enough to listen? It isn’t a US based company. I understand if they remove their US servers, but why do they have to block IPs?

    Can’t US users just get a VPN? Is this whole situation a ploy to ban VPNs and privacy?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      Yes, they can just use a VPN. I’ve told this to several people in my life and many of them write that off as being too difficult to figure out. I even gave my VPN un & pw to a family member with a link to download the app and they still just said “nah.”

      Some people just can’t be bothered to try, I guess.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 days ago

    There are multiple ways of doing this and I’m not sure which methods tik tok is using.

    • ip address there’s a group called IANA that issues blocks of IP addresses to ISPs and there a companies like Maxmind that package that info. apps can create rules block requests based on that info that block requests coming from a specific location or return an error to the user

    • removing from the app store Companies can ask app stores to no longer offer downloads in a specific region and as the app updates it will become more busted over time

    • user information Based info provided by the user directly during sign up or from the social login a user used to sign up with tik tok

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        234 days ago

        afaik the legislation doesn’t include active blocking of a qualifying service’s (which includes tiktok by name, but is not limited to only it or bytedance) traffic…

        it only prohibits the distribution of their ‘apps’ (such as via google/apple ‘stores’)–this is the part that does most the heavy lifting, and hosting of their services within the u.s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        154 days ago

        No, US is not blocking it (there isn’t even infrastructure in place for such a request, we don’t have a “Great Firewall of China”)

        However, the VPN is required because reportedly TikTok themselves will stop allowing US based users to see content which is above and beyond what the law calls for

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 days ago

            Good thing we live a country with plenty of good honorable ISPs. Xfinity, Verizon and uhh… What’s that other one that offers 10mbps for $200/m?

      • Porto881
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I dont think any ISP will be forced to given that both the current and next WH have said they won’t enforce a ban. If it goes dark, it’ll be TikTok themselves blocking access

        Edit: called it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It will probably be removed from DNS (and appstores). Google IANA , and DNS if you want to know more.

        PS Ofc the company itself will stop its services. It’s not like they want beef with a whole country (any, not just US).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 days ago

          I’m not an expert. Removing it from DNS would stop anyone using that DNS from accessing it, right? So if I’m in Australia, using a US DNS, I wouldn’t be able to access it. And vice versa- Anyone in the US could just change their DNS to something outside the US.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            Yea. DNS is just an address book (name to IP). There’s a bit more to how it is structured, but it’s not that complicated.

            Actually thinking about it, they would not have to remove the “domain” (tiktok.com or whatever it is), they (tiktok) would just have to stop using it for business. They could like put a banner that says “tiktok is no longer avalible here” or whatever.

            Other part is IP. As you said, you could just change what dns server your phone asks for IPs and use it like normal. The government could block the IP at the big nodes going out of the country. Then you would have to use a vpn. Idk what they (usa or tiktok) have done, but I know tiktok will not actively try to skirt around it and will remove themselves. I would expect someone stupid like musky to try something, but big companies are usually serious.

            Anyway, they can’t stop vpns. But vpns are a pain for regular folk.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        I feel like it’s pretty irrelevant honestly.

        Like if my house is burning down I don’t care whether I have my blue boxers or my green boxers nor whether China knows.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    154 days ago

    I believe Google and Apple are to be fined if they don’t remove the app from their stores.

    We don’t have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs, so current users will still be able to access it. So you shouldn’t need a VPN.

    Android users could side load the app if they want.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 days ago

        On Android you can download apps (.APK files) from the web, and install them without any app store.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Not quite. You don’t need any app store at all.
          You literally download an APK file from a website or anywhere, then install it directly. Could even be a friend with a thumb drive. Doesn’t matter how you get it, it’s just a file.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -53 days ago

            Yeah. Dont do that. Its how you install viruses.

            Install through another app store like fdroid. Its the secure way to get APKs

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              That’s got nothing to do with what sideloading means.

              And the risks are very overblown.
              While it’s possible, it’s extremely rare.

              Mostly because the potent target pool is so small. Bigger potentials for bad guys if they trick app stores into approving trojan horse apps, because everyone thinks app stores are safer.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      24 days ago

      Public DNS servers hosted in the US will get notified to delist the domain or direct it to an alternate IP. ISPs will get notified to route IP traffic elsewhere.

      • borari
        link
        fedilink
        164 days ago

        Source this information, because it is almost positively incorrect.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -44 days ago

          I have personal experience with backbone carriers.

          • borari
            link
            fedilink
            134 days ago

            Yeah, I do to. We’re not talking about theoretically blocking access to a site nation wide. We’re talking about the TikTok ban, which doesn’t stipulate any sort of network blocking, it’s just a delisting from the app stores.

            The government has never required dns providers to remove records for a domain, or required ISPs to null route traffic to IPs. That’s almost certainly a First Amendment issue, and I can only imagine that such an order would be immediately challenged in court.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              04 days ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States

              Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA)

              In March 2008, the New York Times reported that a blocklist published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency established under the Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 and other federal legislation, included websites, so that US companies are prohibited from doing business with those websites and must freeze their assets. The blocklist had the effect that US-based domain name registrars must block those websites. According to the article, eNom, a private domain name registrar and Web hosting company operating in the US, disables domain names that appear on the blocklist.[38] It described eNom’s disabling of a European travel agent’s web sites advertising travel to Cuba, which appeared on the list.[39] According to the report, the US government claimed that eNom was “legally required” to block the websites under US law, even though the websites were not hosted in the US, were not targeted at US persons, and were legal under foreign law.

              As far as null routing IPs, we’ll see.

              • borari
                link
                fedilink
                74 days ago

                We won’t see, it’s never happened and isn’t a requirement in the ban bill.

                Read the cited article in Wikipedia. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407043030/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html eNom didn’t block DNS users from resolving the domains, they were the registrar for the domains. The domain owners were paying eNom to list their records. As soon as the domain owners moved to a different DNS provider, anyone in the US would be able to access the sites again, even users using eNom public dns servers (if they exist idk).

                You didn’t cite a case of the US blocking DNS providers from resolving a domain, you cited a case of the US blocking a registrar from doing business with an entity on a blocklist published by OFAC.

        • borari
          link
          fedilink
          24 days ago

          This is not an action that will be initiated by the incoming ban, just fyi.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -24 days ago

          To be fair, it wouldn’t be every ISP that would reroute, just backbone ones. Their routing tables would filter down to regional and last mile networks.

          • borari
            link
            fedilink
            44 days ago

            When have any Tier One providers in the Is done such a thing in the US?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        This isn’t North Korea.
        Even China and Russia can’t fully block things.
        Our networks aren’t nearly as controlled as theirs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      he wouldn’t be able to, anyway.

      the deadline is the sunday the 19th. monday the 20th is mlk day (federal holiday, courthouses closed. ag couldn’t file proceedings to enforce the legislation) and the last morning of the biden administration. diaperking is then in charge. even though it was his idea to begin with, he’s flopped on the issue.

  • Fugtig Fisk
    link
    fedilink
    74 days ago

    I believe thar they said in the news here in Europe, that any service that distributes the tok tok app to the USA market, will be fined $5000 per download!

    It will not be illegal to have but it won’t be updated in the US market and new users won’t be able to download it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    74 days ago

    The US servers are being shut off because they don’t want to risk the fines even though the current administration said they wouldn’t enforce them. TikTok will go black for us users tomorrow. I’m sure there will some way around it for those dedicated enough to find it but the average user will lose access on 1/19.

  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 days ago

    Generally the large ISP will receive an order to sinkhole the tt domains for their users. And most normal people use a modem supplied by the ISP it will use the ISP DNS server or their phones will use the mobile providers DNS servers.

    It will not block a determined person but it will effectively block it for a large chunk of the US internet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      Man I wish I invested in some VPN stock a few years ago. I’m sure they’ll be making a killing with all the us porn bans and now this.

      • slazer2au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        A publicly listed VPN provider would be a huge red flag. No matter what they said, their primary commitment would be to shareholders.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      63 days ago

      I know how to get around it. I was curious to know the level at which it was being blocked. Is it the DNS, is it some kind of firewall…etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 days ago

        Tbh, it’s tik tom blocking you, not the US, the US only requires the app stores to remove it. I think the easiest way for TikTok to find out where the request comes from is the client IP. And the only way to get around this is through a VPN. I don’t exactly know though, I haven’t seen a lot of technical stuff around it, and I’m not in the US to test it. I’d love to know if anyone else has a tip on this.